Examination Yourself: Psychologists Created a Quiz to Define Your Sense of Sense of humour

Photo: George Marks/Getty Images

In 1979, a New York Post editor past the proper noun of Norman Cousins published a memoir called Beefcake of an Illness. The volume, which described how Cousins used laughter to aid him recover from an ill-defined disorder, was a smash striking, and did quite a bit to further the idea of humour as a panacea. It'due south a notion that persists today, and not just in clichés ("laughter is the best medicine"); when yous accept a particularly atrocious day, information technology's natural to achieve for a comedy or seek out an alibi for laughs as a option-me-up.

But that's not quite right: Humor isn't an unqualified skillful, and a psychology researcher named Rod Martin, who recently retired from the University of Western Ontario, has defended his career to proving it. Martin was just starting out in the field when Cousins published his volume; Intrigued by its message, he decided to investigate its scientific merit — only earlier he could do that, he had to effigy out how to measure out humor, an amorphous, multifaceted concept, in a scientific way.

At the fourth dimension, humor enquiry was considered a fringe interest in psychology. Attempts to study sense of humour looked less like scientific measurements and more like BuzzFeed quizzes: Researchers would present people with a series of jokes and cartoons and inquire them which ones they found funny, bold that the answers would reveal something about the respondent's personality. The problem was, these studies failed to find a relationship between personality and taste in jokes. Self-reports of sense of humour, meanwhile, are notoriously unreliable (everyone thinks they have a proficient sense of humor, and at least some of them accept to be wrong).

Martin took a different tactic: Modeling his approach afterward recently developed tests to mensurate anxiety, he focused not on the jokes themselves, but on how respondents used humour in everyday life. The end upshot would go his signature work: the Sense of humour Styles Questionnaire, the first scientifically validated measure of humour. In 2003, Martin and his colleagues published the HSQ in the Journal of Inquiry in Personality; today, it's in common use all over the globe.

The HSQ divides humor into 4 main styles: Affiliative, Cocky-Enhancing, Aggressive, and Self-Defeating. Affiliative sense of humour means bang-up jokes, engaging in banter, and otherwise using humor to make others like us. Self-enhancing humor is an optimistic, coping sense of humor, characterized by the ability to laugh at yourself or at the applesauce of a situation and feel better as a result. Aggressive humor is characterized by sarcasm, teasing, criticism, and ridicule. Self-defeating humour is attempting to get others to like us by putting ourselves down. See for yourself which category best describes your own humor (though information technology's important to note that the lines betwixt humor styles aren't difficult and fast, nevertheless, nor are the categories mutually sectional — anybody'south individual sense of humor is a unique combination of all 4 styles).

What's Your Sense of Sense of humour?

"Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire," Periodical of Research in Personality

Unlike his predecessors, Martin did find a link between sure sense of humor styles and certain traits: Affiliative and self-enhancing humor are linked to extraversion and openness to new experiences, and self-defeating humour to neuroticism. Affiliative and self-enhancing humor are also generally adaptive, both correlated with greater mental well-being, while aggressive and self-defeating humor are more often than not maladaptive. In that location are plenty of exceptions, though: Aggressive and self-defeating jokes tin can exist fine and fifty-fifty benign when used sparingly and in the right context. Likewise, fifty-fifty affiliative and self-enhancing humor tin can get maladaptive when used in excess. "Some people are always laughing and joking as a way of avoiding bug," Martin says.

"It's really the mode we utilise humor that is most important," he adds. "Non then much how funny y'all are, but how you apply humor in advancing relationships or in detrimental ways."

This may exist the cardinal to agreement humor'due south human relationship to well-existence: It's all in how you wield it. Someone who goes overboard with ambitious humor, for example, may feel ameliorate near themselves in the curt term by putting other people downward. But sooner or afterward, they may find people pulling away for fright of becoming a target; eventually, their relationships may deteriorate, along with their psychological well-being. In one 2014 report led by Sara Caird, a graduate student of Martin's, couples who reported using more aggressive humor as well had lower relationship satisfaction; on the flip side, when people engaged in more than affiliative and adaptive humor with their partners, they experienced a greater sense of intimacy and reported more positive and less negative moods.

So if humor doesn't primarily serve to promote psychological well-beingness, what does it do? "I recall it primarily has a social function." Martin says. "From an evolutionary perspective, we evolved every bit a social animal. We needed other people to survive. So anything that tin can enhance the cohesiveness of groups of people was adaptive," even when that cohesion came at the expense of outsiders: "Humour is a very ambitious thing," he adds. "Y'all're laughing with your friends, at your enemies. In that location'south aspects of that I think tin be maladaptive in the here and at present that might have been adaptive in one fourth dimension." Sense of humor was never a panacea, but it is a powerful tool — one that can be used for positive purposes, merely merely if yous so choose.

Psychologists Created a Quiz to Ascertain Your Sense of Sense of humor